This section needs additional citations for verification.
The death penalty provides for retribution against perpetrators and makes sure that they pay for their actions. Criminals need to be held accountable for their actions. While no one enjoys the thought of having to kill someone, it can also be argued that the murderer bought the punishment on him or herself when he or she took the life of another.
The Death Penalty is Necessary to Deter Other Criminals One of the best arguments for the death penalty is that capital punishment is a huge deterrent we have to prevent others from committing heinous crimes.
The best way to deal with crime obviously is to stop it from happening in the first place. In turn, the best way to do that is to deter criminals from committing crimes.
When it comes to murder, torture and other heinous crimes, the best deterrent we have is the death penalty. Criminals should be aware that that if they commit a serious crime, then their punishment will be equally as serious. No one wants to die -- this is why using the death penalty as a deterrent is an effective way of stopping crimes from happening in the first place.
These criminals must be killed because keeping them alive puts their fellow prisoners, their guards, and the wider community at risk.
For these criminals who essentially have no hope for redemption anymore, the only remaining option is to remove them from existence.
Violent criminals pose risks that are just too great for them to be allowed to live.
Many run the risk of being at risk by these criminals, including but not limited to: Fellow prisoners are the people who are most at risk. One of the reasons prisons are so dangerous is because they are full of murderers and rapists -- it would be unjust to the other inmates to expose them to such violent offenders.
Guards are at risk, as well. Prison officers are often assaulted and even killed by offenders who should have received the death penalty. The wider community is also at risk from violent offenders who either escape prison or are paroled early due to an ineffective parole system.
The safest solution, therefore, is to kill violent offenders before they can be a threat once again. Even if the criminal is placed in the most secure facility possible, fear still grips the families of the victims. We must consider the rights of these families to live normal lives when sentencing murderers; we should prioritize their rights over those of the violent criminal.
This applies especially to criminals who have made threats against other people in society and family members of other victims. The Death Penalty is Cheaper Than a Lifetime Prison Term One of the more controversial arguments for the death penalty is that the cost of keeping someone incarcerated for the duration of their natural life is huge.
Which of the above arguments for the death penalty is the strongest Justice.THE DEATH PENALTY IN THE UNITED STATES This webpage is dedicated to the innocent victims of murder, may they always be remembered. Each execution deters an average of 18 murders according to a nationwide study.
"My object all sublime I shall achieve in time, To let the punishment fit the crime The punishment fit the crime;" 1 What is a Mandatory Sentence? J. L. Mackie - Ethics~ Inventing Right and Wrong (, ) - Free ebook download as PDF File .pdf), Text File .txt) or read book online for free.
DIDCOTT J: I agree with Chaskalson P that our new Constitution (Act of ) outlaws capital punishment in South Africa for the crimes covered by his judgment, and I concur in the order giving effect to that conclusion which he proposes to make..
My grounds for believing the death penalty to be unconstitutional for the crimes in question are these. Singapore's death penalty laws and how they are applied, including death row and execution numbers, death-eligible crimes, methods of execution, appeals and clemency, availability of lawyers, prison conditions, ratification of international instruments, and recent developments.
Bedau’s purpose is to convince people to favor the lifetime imprisonment over the death penalty with an argument that had been previously used by other authors called “The minimal Invasion Argument”, which he considers to be “the best argument against the death penalty”(Bedau, 4).